some mannequin studies

Home Forums Critique some mannequin studies

This topic contains 3 replies, has 2 voices, and was last updated by Aunt Herbert 1 hour ago.

  • Subscribe Favorite
  • #39838
    [img]https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1qO4LSkWmUT2YKxKtDiSo9rHGyrxbAdWq?usp=drive_link[/img]

    All of them were done in 20 minutes and didn't use any strict measuring.
    Students get 33% off full memberships to Line of Action

    Support us to remove this

    #39842
    #39843
    I don't understand your intended process towards a finished product.
    Am I correct in assuming, that you chose digital tools to plot spheroids and tubular forms, all with a lot of contour lines to indicate volume? That does produce a lot of lines, but they rather distract from simplicity. And, well, why do you even bother plotting a 100% precise foundation? How will that help you render the final lines?

    If you draw manually, you have a chance to pick up proportions and rhythms on a haptic level. I am not aware, that digital drawing does this, as you are mostly placing ready objects.
    Or, if you draw manually, you can have a slight foundation, that you can draw over with the final rendering, so the foundation helps, but vanishes into the background or is fully deleted in the end. I am generally not aware, why such a step would be necessary in digital drawing, as you can just manipulate the intermediate lines?

    I mean, the fact, that I have no clue, what you are trying to achieve does not equal you are doing something wrong. Maybe I am just stupid or unable to jump beyond my comfort zone. That fact might give an indication, though, why you might not get a lot of reactions: the likelyhood, that others feel about as buffled as me is decently high.

Login or create an account to participate on the forums.