Mannequinisation II

Home Forums Critique Mannequinisation II

This topic contains 10 replies, has 5 voices, and was last updated by Rosenhips 6 years ago.

  • Subscribe Favorite
  • #2992



    Hello all,

    I've done another Mannequinisation study. I'd appreciate it if you gave some feedback/ critique when you have the chance.

    Thanks in advance.

    Rosenhips.
    • Rosenhips edited this post on September 24, 2018 3:59pm.
    • Sanne edited this post on September 24, 2018 5:48pm. Reason: Formatting issue solved
    • Rosenhips edited this post on September 24, 2018 7:44pm. Reason: Adding image
    • Kim edited this post on September 24, 2018 10:56pm. Reason: Fixing image link
    Please support Line of Action

    Support us to remove this

    #2994
    Hey Rosenhips! Looks like something went a bit funky with your message there, the image didn't show up and hid the rest of your post. Can you try reposting the image? :)
    #2999
    Hello Sanne,

    I've tried re-posting the image again, but it seems to still be hidden, along with the little caption.
    #3001
    Fixed for you. The only thing that should be inside your img tag is the number of the image. :)
    1
    #3005
    These are really good, proportions are there, direction and form. Supergood! The connection between the head and neck on the far right one is a bit strange. How much anatomy are you studying?
    1
    #3008
    Hello Line. I've just started studying anatomy, as it's one of my weaknesses, including extreme angles like the one you pointed out. I'll pay more attention to those areas in the future.



    Thanks for the feedback.
    #3009
    Thanks for the edit Kim.

    Rosenhips
    #3013
    Nice work on these =). You got the torso and the legs pretty well, proportions are also better than the first time.

    The biggest issues I can find with the second batch are:

    1)The necks, which are a bit too tick, try to make them a bit slimmer.

    2) The arms are well done and proportioned, the only issue is the way you connect them to the torso which is a bit too stiff. You have to understand that the "sphere" on the top of the arm is a semplification of the soulder, but they are not really "locked" on the torso and they are free to move to a certain degree. So when you raise the arm over the head or to a horizontal position, you have to put the sphere higher and move it around.

    0elmN21.jpg
    1
    #3017
    Thanks for the feedback and sketch Mike. I'll make sure to keep that in mind when drawing the arms that way.

    Rosenhips
    #3020




    Another mannequinisation study, featuring overweight, skinny and muscular body proportions.

Login or create an account to participate on the forums.